In 1959, Herzberg, Mausner and Snyderman published the two-factor model
of work motivation and developed the motivation-hygiene theory, which was
influenced by Maslow’s hierarchy of needs (Jones, 2011). Herzberg created a
two-dimensional paradigm of factors influencing people’s attitudes towards
work. Initially Herzberg and his colleagues developed a hypothesis that
satisfaction and dissatisfaction with a job were affected by two different sets
of factors and thus satisfaction and dissatisfaction could not be reliably
measured on the same continuum (Herzberg et al., 1959; Stello, 2011). Studies
on job satisfaction were conducted to decide which factors in an employee’s
work environment caused satisfaction or dissatisfaction.
Herzberg et al. (1959) laid the groundwork for the two-factor theory. Herzberg et al. (1959) assert that motivation and hygiene factors influence job satisfaction and performance. Motivational factors are referred to as satisfiers, whereas hygiene factors are referred to as dissatisfiers. Satisfiers and dissatisfiers are mutually exclusive and have varying effects on workplace motivation. Employees are motivated to work harder and are more satisfied with their jobs when they are satisfied. Dissatisfiers do not cause job satisfaction, their absence results in dissatisfaction. Soliman (1970) further developed Herzberg et al. (1959) theory. He distinguished satisfiers from dissatisfiers as higher-order needs and dissatisfiers from lower-order needs. Zhang & Dran (2000) discovered evidence in website design supporting the two-factor theory. According to the two-factor theory, satisfiers and dissatisfiers each contain a distinct set of factors (Herzberg et al., 1959; Soliman, 1970; Zhang & Dran, 2000). This assumption of the two-factor theory prompted researchers to conduct a thorough examination of online reviews from websites to identify a distinct set of factors contributing to consumer satisfaction and dissatisfaction (Levy et al., 2012; Li et al., 2013).
Herzberg et al. (1959) laid the groundwork for the two-factor theory. Herzberg et al. (1959) assert that motivation and hygiene factors influence job satisfaction and performance. Motivational factors are referred to as satisfiers, whereas hygiene factors are referred to as dissatisfiers. Satisfiers and dissatisfiers are mutually exclusive and have varying effects on workplace motivation. Employees are motivated to work harder and are more satisfied with their jobs when they are satisfied. Dissatisfiers do not cause job satisfaction, their absence results in dissatisfaction. Soliman (1970) further developed Herzberg et al. (1959) theory. He distinguished satisfiers from dissatisfiers as higher-order needs and dissatisfiers from lower-order needs. Zhang & Dran (2000) discovered evidence in website design supporting the two-factor theory. According to the two-factor theory, satisfiers and dissatisfiers each contain a distinct set of factors (Herzberg et al., 1959; Soliman, 1970; Zhang & Dran, 2000). This assumption of the two-factor theory prompted researchers to conduct a thorough examination of online reviews from websites to identify a distinct set of factors contributing to consumer satisfaction and dissatisfaction (Levy et al., 2012; Li et al., 2013).
Video 1: Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs in the Workplace
Source: (Organizational Communication Channel, 2016)
The traditional Herzberg approach represented both job satisfaction and dissatisfaction on the same continuum, but at opposite ends. Later on, satisfaction and dissatisfaction were separated into different sets of categories, each accompanied by distinct set factors. Hygiene factors decreased dissatisfaction, whereas it was the motivators that increased satisfaction. Hence, the updated two-factor theory that claimed satisfaction and dissatisfaction to be determined by different set of factors was reinforced (Brenner, Carmack, & Weinstein, 1971). It must be noted that Herzberg’s theory of motivation derived inspiration from Maslow’s hierarchy of needs (Dartey-Baah & Amoako, 2011). Hygiene factors, fulfilled “the need to avoid unpleasantness” while the motivation factors met “the need of the individual for self-growth and selfactualization” (Alshmemri, Maude, & Phillip, 2017).
Maliban Biscuit Manufactories (pvt) Ltd, a renowned FMCG firm in Sri Lanka, prioritizes employee happiness with its facilities. Most facilities are focused on promoting recognition, status, personal worth, and self-realization, and organizations always prioritize employment environment variables such as policies and working conditions in order to prevent unhappiness. During COVID 19, the company took every care to protect our employees and their families. We also pushed personnel to have a cheerful attitude in high-pressure situations.
Reference
Armstrong, M. & Taylor, S. 2014. Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Man-agement Practice. 13th ed. Ashford Colour press Ltd. London.
Armstrong, M (2006). A handbook of human resource management practice, 10th edn, Kogan Page, Ltd
Adair, John. (2006). Part 2. Maslow and Herzberg, Chapter 6. Herzberg’s motivationhygiene theory. Leadership and motivation. London and Philadelphia: Kogan Page
Alshmemri,M & Maude,P.(2017) Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory. Life Sci J 2017;14(5):12-16]. ISSN: 1097-8135 (Print)
Ousaf,S.(2020) Dissection of Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory to Predict Job Satisfaction. The Lahore Journal of Business, 8 : 2 (Spring 2020): pp. 85–128
Ramlall, S. (2004). A review of employee motivation theories and their implications for employee retention within organizations. Journal of American academy of business, 5(1/2), 52-63


Hello Nishad, agree with your post. The two-dimensional paradigm of factors created Herzberg says of influencing people’s attitudes towards work. In the theory developed by Herzberg and his colleagues job satisfaction is affected by satisfaction and dissatisfaction both of which cannot be measured on the same continuum (Herzberg et al., 1959; Stello, 2011).
ReplyDeleteAccording to Herzberg et al. (1959) job satisfaction could be created by having motivational factors but it leads to dissatisfaction with the absence of motivational factors. Herzberg et al. (1959) further states job dissatisfaction may be caused with poor hygiene factors, while better hygiene factors cannot cause job satisfaction but can reduce dissatisfaction.
Hi Nilushi,
DeleteHerzberg explained that the opposite of job dissatisfaction is no job dissatisfaction. Likewise, the opposite of job satisfaction is no job satisfaction (Herzberg, 1966; Herzberg, 2003).
Agreed with you Nishad , Herzberg, Mausner, and Snyderman established the motivation-hygiene hypothesis in 1959, based on Maslow's hierarchy of requirements (Jones, 2011).
ReplyDeleteCorrect Maheshani,
DeleteHerzberg’s theory is one of the most significant content theories in job satisfaction (Dion, 2006)
Hi Nishad. Ageed with you. Herzberg's two-factor theory or Herzberg's dual-factor theory is another name for the motivation-hygiene theory (1959). The distinction between motivational and hygienic variables is the central premise of this philosophy. These two factors that influence job satisfaction are separated into two groups. Motivation elements are seen to be more essential than hygiene aspects in determining job happiness.
ReplyDeleteCorrect Ruwan, adding to this "
DeleteThe tasks assigned to employees and the geographical regions play a crucial role in studying the relationship between motivation and job satisfaction (Islam and Saha, 2016).
Hi Nishad, I agree with you. Further more Motivation factors are intrinsic factors will increase employees' job satisfaction; while hygiene factors are extrinsic factors to prevent any employees' dissatisfaction (Robbins, 2009).
ReplyDelete